Comparison of Pressure Sensor in Flow Analyzer Design for Peep Measurement on Ventilators
Abstract
The PEEP parameter is one of the parameters that need to be considered in mechanical ventilation because inappropriate parameter values can increase the risk of death for patients. Monitoring of these parameters can be done using a flow analyzer. The purpose of this study is to find out which pressure sensor is stable and has high accuracy. This study compares MPX2010DP and MPX5010DP pressure sensors where the readings of the two sensors will be compared with the pressure read by DPM (Digital Pressure Meter). The pressure read is the pressure obtained from the lung test with 11 pressure reading points and carried out as many as 5 experiments. The results of this study found that the smallest percentage of error was found in the MPX2010DP sensor at a pressure of 5 cmH2O rising pressure and 20 cmH2O rising pressure with an error percentage of 0.00%, while the largest percentage of error was found in the MPX2010DP sensor at a pressure of 5 cmH2O down pressure with an error percentage of 5.16%. The largest standard deviation value is 0.52 found on the MPX5010DP sensor at a pressure of 20 cmH2O rising pressure. The greatest uncertainty value is 0.23 found in the MPX5010DP sensor at a pressure of 20 cmH2O rising pressure. While the largest correction value is 0.54 on the MPX5010DP sensor at a pressure of 25 cmH2O rising pressure. From the data obtained, it can be said that the sensor MPX2010DP more accurate and more stable.
Downloads
References
X. Li and X. Ma, “Acute respiratory failure in COVID-19: Is it ‘typical’ ARDS?,” Critical Care, vol. 24, no. 1. BioMed Central Ltd., May 06, 2020. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02911-9.
C. Huang et al., “Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China,” The Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10223, pp. 497–506, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
R. Lu et al., “Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding,” The Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10224, pp. 565–574, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8.
N. Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 382, no. 8, pp. 727–733, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2001017.
J. F. W. Chan et al., “A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster,” The Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10223, pp. 514–523, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9.
L. T. Phan et al., “Importation and Human-to-Human Transmission of a Novel Coronavirus in Vietnam,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 382, no. 9, pp. 872–874, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1056/nejmc2001272.
C. Rabec, G. Emeriaud, A. Amadeo, B. Fauroux, and M. Georges, “New modes in non-invasive ventilation,” Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, vol. 18. W.B. Saunders Ltd, pp. 73–84, Mar. 01, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2015.10.004.
J. M. Pearce, “A review of open source ventilators for COVID-19 and future pandemics,” F1000Res, vol. 9, p. 218, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22942.1.
W. P. King et al., “Emergency ventilator for COVID-19,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 12 December, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244963.
A. Serpa Neto, M. B. P. Amato, and M. J. Schultz, “Dissipated Energy is a Key Mediator of VILI: Rationale for Using Low Driving Pressures,” 2016, pp. 311–321. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27349-5_25.
L. Gattinoni, E. Carlesso, P. Cadringher, F. Valenza, F. Vagginelli, and D. Chiumello, “Physical and biological triggers of ventilator-induced lung injury and its prevention,” in European Respiratory Journal, Supplement, Nov. 2003. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00021303.
A. Protti et al., “Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation: Any difference between statics and dynamics?,” Crit Care Med, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1046–1055, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827417a6.
M. Cressoni et al., “Mechanical power and development of ventilator-induced lung injury,” Anesthesiology, vol. 124, no. 5, pp. 1100–1108, May 2016, doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001056.
K. Iyengar, S. Bahl, Raju Vaishya, and A. Vaish, “Challenges and solutions in meeting up the urgent requirement of ventilators for COVID-19 patients,” in Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, Elsevier Ltd, Jul. 2020, pp. 499–501. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.048.
C. Cimino et al., “N-BiPAP vs n-CPAP in term neonate with respiratory distress syndrome,” Early Hum Dev, vol. 142, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.104965.
G. M. Piscitello, E. M. Kapania, W. D. Miller, J. C. Rojas, M. Siegler, and W. F. Parker, “Variation in ventilator allocation guidelines by us state during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A systematic review,” JAMA Network Open, vol. 3, no. 6. American Medical Association, Jun. 19, 2020. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12606.
K. Iyengar, S. Bahl, Raju Vaishya, and A. Vaish, “Challenges and solutions in meeting up the urgent requirement of ventilators for COVID-19 patients,” in Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, Elsevier Ltd, Jul. 2020, pp. 499–501. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.048.
T. Abuzairi and A. Irfan, “COVENT-Tester: A low-cost, open source ventilator tester”, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4620223.
IEEE Region 10, IEEE Seoul Section, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Korea Council, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Proceedings of TENCON 2018 : 2018 IEEE Region 10 Conference : Jeju, Korea, 28-31 October 2018.
H. R. Fajrin, E. Susanto, P. S. A. Kristianto, F. F. Herdiyana, and S. A. Wibowo, “Design of Ventilator with Gas Mixing, Tidal Volume, and Humidifier Parameters,” Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 348–353, May 2022, doi: 10.18196/jrc.v3i3.14510.
P. Zhang, J. Sun, G. Wan, and W. Liu, “DEVELOPMENT OF VENTILATOR TESTER CALIBRATION EQUIPMENT,” 2015.
F. Morales, L. Bernal, G. Pereira, S. Pérez-Buitrago, M. Kammer, and D. H. Stalder, “PytuTester: RaspberryPi open-source ventilator tester Specifications table,” 2022, doi: 10.17632/w6v48k72z8.1.
S. Razwanul Haque Bengal Champ, A. K. M Maruf Hossain, S. Sudan Saha, and H. Rahman Sohag, “Rapidly developable low cost and power-efficient portable turbine-based emergency ventilator Turbine Based Open Source Medical Ventilator View project Qxm App-An Interactive Platform for Quiz and Exam View project.” [Online]. Available: https://certification.oshwa.org/bd000001.html
Copyright (c) 2023 Levana Forra Wakidi, Farid Amrinsani, Alfi Nur Zeha, Riqqah Dewiningrum, Steyve Nyatte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
